Remember the time Donald Trump lost the 2020 election and then spent months baselessly insisting it had been stolen from him, lies that culminated in a violent attack on the U.S. To be clear, given the circumstances, these are appropriate responses. Mar-a-Lago himself, who you know ignores the “employees must wash hands before returning to work” sign. In short, if you’ve been paying any attention at all, this news has no doubt caused you to panic, driven you to drink, or ripped through your stomach like a batch of bad oysters shucked by Mr. On the other hand, the fact that he has a greater than 0% chance of making it back to the White House should terrify everyone in this country, as well as the people living in the countries he’d probably drop a bomb on given the chance-and considering the 74,223,369 who voted for him last time, including those who have publicly stated he’s a danger to society but would nevertheless still vote for him again, his odds are clearly a lot higher than that. Something like that!ĭoes Trump actually have a shot at winning? On the one hand, his longtime pals in the conservative media seemingly abandoned him after the midterms in favor of Ron DeSantis, and a recent poll gave the Florida governor a slight edge over the ex-president. Or the worst president in modern history, the one who incited a violent coup because his ego is so fragile he couldn’t admit he’d lost, deciding to take another stab at terrorizing the nation for another four years. Or finding out your Stage IV rectal cancer had returned, after nearly killing you the first time. But it would kind of be like the bubonic plague announcing a comeback and expecting people to be happy about it. As he is one of just a handful of ex-presidents to run again after losing reelection, there aren’t a lot of historical parallels for this. They come in through Gamergate or whatever and then get turned onto politics and Trump.If you’re reading this, then you probably already know: Donald Trump is officially running for president for a third time, having announced the news at Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday night. "I realized Milo could connect with these kids right away," Bannon told Green. And that helped fuel an online alt-right movement sparked by Breitbart News. Yiannopoulos devoted much of Bretibart's tech coverage to cultural issues, particularly Gamergate, a long-running online argument over gaming culture that peaked in 2014. "The difference was, Andrew had a very strong moral universe, and Milo is an amoral nihilist." Like Andrew Breitbart, Yiannopoulos "just had that 'it' factor," Bannon says in the book. Green postulates that Bannon's time at IGE was "one that introduced him to a hidden world, burrowed deep into his psyche, and provided a kind of conceptual framework that he would later draw on to build up the audience for Breitbart News, and then to help marshal the online armies of trolls and activists that overran national politicians and helped give rise to Donald Trump," Green writes.Īfter taking over in 2012 at the Breitbart News Network - it was founded five years earlier by Andrew Breitbart, who died in 2012 - Bannon recruited Milo Yiannopoulos to handle technology coverage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |